Legal Opinion
State of Cal. Ex Rel. Dept. of Water Resources v. Natomas Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 24, 1966No. Civ. 11078PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DYKE, J. *
This is a condemnation action brought by the state to acquire property necessary for the Feather River Project in Butte County.
On May 10, 1961, the Director of the Department of Water Resources adopted a declaration basically providing: “ [I]t is necessary to acquire in the name of the State of California title in fee simple to certain parcels of real property in the County of Butte. ...” And that “ [P]ublie interest and necessity require the acquisition of the real property interest .. . for the construction, maintenance and operation ... by the State of the improvement for…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Miro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Phillips v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.