Legal Opinion
In Re Huddleson
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 14, 1964No. Crim. 4488; Crim. 4602PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
The separate cases present a single common issue: the constitutionality of subdivision (2) of section 647a of the Penal Code. This subdivision provides: “Every person who loiters about any school or public place at or near which children attend or normally congregate is a vagrant, and is punishable by a fine of not exceeding five hundred dollars ($500) or by imprisonment in the county jail for not exceeding six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment.’ ’
In No. 4488 defendant Huddleson entered a plea of guilty to a complaint filed in the Municipal Court for the City and County of San…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bodinson Manufacturing Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- In Re CreglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Nino v. Gladys R.California Supreme Court · 1970
- City of Seattle v. DrewWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Leonard James McSherry v. Sherman Block, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Mandel v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. BratisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.