Legal Opinion

Goldmann Trust v. Goldmann

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1965PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The only issue involved on this appeal is whether the disagreement concerning termination of employment of a permanent employee is a question or dispute between the parties which is subject to arbitration under paragraph 15 of the partnership agreement.

Appellant contends that since withholding written consent to a permanent employee’s discharge is an absolute right or privilege of each party, there is no dispute calling for arbitration. Respondents on the other hand urge that once *146mutuál written consent cannot be obtained, a dispute arises that is subject to the arbitration procedure…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lower Baraboo River Drainage District v. SchirmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Nelson v. BoosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Thomsen-Abbott Construction Co. v. City of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Milwaukee County v. H. Neidner & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Frankfurth v. SteinmeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Enchanted World Doll Museum v. BuskohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Goebel v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Capital Investments, Inc. v. Whitehall Packing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Ruppa v. American States InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Herchelroth v. MaharWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API