Goldmann Trust v. Goldmann
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
The only issue involved on this appeal is whether the disagreement concerning termination of employment of a permanent employee is a question or dispute between the parties which is subject to arbitration under paragraph 15 of the partnership agreement.
Appellant contends that since withholding written consent to a permanent employee’s discharge is an absolute right or privilege of each party, there is no dispute calling for arbitration. Respondents on the other hand urge that once *146mutuál written consent cannot be obtained, a dispute arises that is subject to the arbitration procedure…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lower Baraboo River Drainage District v. SchirmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Nelson v. BoosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Thomsen-Abbott Construction Co. v. City of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Milwaukee County v. H. Neidner & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Frankfurth v. SteinmeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Enchanted World Doll Museum v. BuskohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Goebel v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Capital Investments, Inc. v. Whitehall Packing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Ruppa v. American States InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Herchelroth v. MaharWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.