Milwaukee County v. H. Neidner & Co.

The following opinion was filed November 5, 1935 :

Fowler, J.

The appellant Schranz Company, hereinafter referred to as the appellant, contends that the court erred to its prejudice: (1) In permitting H. Neidner & Company to *192amend its complaint at the close of the testimony; (2) in findirig that the tiling buckled and cracked because the waterproofing did not bind the tiling to the shower walls; (3) in finding that the want of a binding of the tiling to the walls was due to lack of workmanship ; (4) in assessing as damages cost of replacement not guaranteed by the construction contract; (5) in…