Thomsen-Abbott Construction Co. v. City of Wausau
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
The controlling issue raised by this appeal is whether the clause of the contract, which provides for adjustment of the contract price on the basis of $74 per cubic yard of concrete in the event more or less concrete is required in laying the foundations than called for by the plans, covers the item of the extra cost of dewatering made necessary by lowering the footings to a depth greater than shown on the plans. Such contract clause will hereinafter be referred to as the “unit-price provision.”
The defendant city takes the position that the unit-price provision does cover the dewatering and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Hersey Gravel Co. v. State Highway DepartmentMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Mueller v. Eau Claire CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- First Savings & Trust Co. v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bignold v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Home Owners Construction Co. v. Borough of Glen RockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- A. Teichert & Son, Inc. v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Metropolitan Sewerage Commission v. R. W. Construction, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.