Herchelroth v. Mahar
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
Appellant nowhere in his brief argues in support of his appeal from the order denying his “motion for declaratory judgment” and motion for summary judgment, nor includes the order in his appendix. This portion of the appeal can, therefore, be dismissed. Schaefer v. Bednarski (1956), 271 Wis. 574, 74 N. W. 2d 191.
The respondent’s cross complaint alleged that the truck in the accident “was under written lease” between respondent and appellant, which provided in part as follows :
“. . . The lessor agrees to secure and pay for property damage and public liability insurance on the leased equipment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pittsburgh Steel Co. v. Patterson-Emerson-Comstock, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Worden-Allen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. Federal Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- Mustas v. INLAND CONSTRUCTION, INC.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Teasdale v. TeasdaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Sydenstricker v. Unipunch Products, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Dykstra v. Arthur G. McKee & Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- Capital Investments, Inc. v. Whitehall Packing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Pritts v. J I Case Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Baker v. McDel Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.