Hammond Lumber Co. v. Goldberg
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
OGDEN, J., pro tem.
The above actions, consolidated for trial, were instituted by the respondents to foreclose their respective mechanics’ liens for the unpaid balance due on account of materials furnished in the construction of certain buildings and improvements constituting an “automobile laundry”.
Respondent Hammond Lumber Company was awarded judgment against defendant Sam B. Goldberg in the sum of $7,967.03 and respondent American System of Reinforcing was awarded judgment against the same defendant in the sum of $434.51. Both judgments further decree, in the usual form, that respondents…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. Mountaineer Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Hamilton v. Delhi Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Pasqualetti v. HilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- S. H. Harmon Lumber Co. v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Western Elec. Co., Inc. v. ColleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United Accounts, Incorporated v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Albuquerque Lumber Co. v. Montevista Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
- Clay v. SandalAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Kim v. JF ENTERPRISESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.