Legal Opinion

Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. Ross

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1939No. Civ. 2268PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

This is an action to foreclose a lien for materials used in alteration work on a building in Bakersfield, Kern County, California. At the trial it was conceded by all parties that materials of the approximate value alleged in the complaint were furnished by the plaintiff and were actually used in the work of construction, with the exception of $26.60, representing the charges for cartage of approximately $900 worth of materials. It was further conceded at the trial and the court found that the plaintiff was entitled to a lien against the right, title and interest of the defendant and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Santa Monica Lumber & Mill Co. v. HegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. English v. Olympic Auditorium, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1933
  3. West Coast Lumber Co. v. NewkirkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Adams v. BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Wilson v. NugentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arthur B. Siri, Inc. v. BridgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. Orondo MinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Los Banos Gravel Co. v. FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Bond Electric Co. v. Mill City Plastics, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API