Hamilton v. Delhi Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of Nevada County. John Caldwell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
Action to enforce laborers’ liens against the mine and mining property of the defendant, Peach Blow Consolidated Gold Mining Company.
There are cross-appeals, both upon the judgment-roll, without a bill of exceptions, the plaintiffs appealing from a part only of *150the judgment, and the defendants Baldwin and the intervenor jointly appealing from the whole thereof.
1. The last-mentioned appeal will be first considered. The material facts involved in this appeal are these: In December, 1894, George W. Baldwin, Sr., owning the Bast Orleans and Baldwin, or Gracie, locations, and George W. Baldwin,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Malone v. Big Flat Gravel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- Silvester v. Coe Quartz Mine Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Tredinnick v. Red Cloud Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1887
- John A. Roebling's Sons Co. v. Humboldt Electric Light & Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by16 opinions
- Halbert's Lumber, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Phillips v. Salmon River Mining & Development Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1903
- California Portland Cement Co. v. Wentworth Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Stimson Mill Co. v. Los Angles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Towle v. SweeneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.