S. H. Harmon Lumber Co. v. Brown
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The above entitled actions for the foreclosure of mechanics’ liens were consolidated for trial. At the close of the cases of plaintiffs, the defendants made motions for nonsuit, which were granted, and judgment dismissing the action entered. The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment.
The defendant Brown was and is the owner of a lot on the corner of Mission and Seventeenth streets, in the city and county of San Francisco, having a frontage of one hundred and ten feet on Mission Street. Adjoining this property to the south is a lot, fronting fifty feet on Mission Street, owned by the defendant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Santa Monica Lumber & Mill Co. v. HegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- West Coast Lumber Co. v. NewkirkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Harlan v. StufflebeemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Willamette Steam Mills Co. v. KremerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Lamont v. LeFevreMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- English v. Olympic Auditorium, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Morgan v. Reasor Corp.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Hayward Lumber & Investment Co. v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Rio Grande Lumber & Fuel Co. v. BuergoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- Boscus v. BohligCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.