Williams v. Mountaineer Gold Mining Co.

The Court.

Upon further consideration of this cause in Bank, we are satisfied with the conclusion *136which was reached by Department One in its opinion filed November 8, 1893, and for the reasons stated in said opinion the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

De Haven, J., did not participate in the foregoing decision.

The following is the opinion of Department One-above referred to:

Temple, C.—The general nature of this case is well stated in the first finding of facts, which is as follows:

“ The defendant, the Mountaineer Gold Mining Company, a corporation, at all the times referred to in…