Legal Opinion

Tepel v. Sima

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 31, 1942No. 33,166PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Streissguth, Justice.

Action by a married woman to recover from her former employer the difference between wages actually paid her and the minimum wages prescribed by order of the industrial commission, with penalties and attorneys’ fees. The trial court directed a verdict for the employer upon the theory that the minimum w'age order relied on did not apply to an employment of the character involved. The appeal is from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

In determining the correctness of the order below, we must here view the testimony in the light most favorable to plaintiff,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Administrator of the Wage & Hour Division of the Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mammenga v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Martin v. WolfsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Barnes v. MacKenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Howie v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API