Legal Opinion
State v. Howard
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 15, 1985No. C7-84-1087PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Respondent Jeffrey Howard has owned a game farm in Plymouth, Minnesota, since March 1982. In May 1982 Plymouth passed an ordinance prohibiting the keeping of wild animals in the city and subsequently notified Howard that he must remove his animals. Howard succeeded in enjoining enforcement of the ordinance while he contested its constitutionality. In the meantime he was prosecuted for violating a zoning ordinance by operating the game farm and was acquitted. After a district court found the “wild animal ordinance” constitutional, the State charged Howard with violating it…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Samuels v. McCurdySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- State v. ReilandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- State Department of Labor & Industry Ex Rel. Special Compensation Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Laue v. Production Credit Ass'n of Blooming PrairieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Laue v. Production Credit Ass'n of Blooming PrairieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.