Legal Opinion

Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Administrator of the Wage & Hour Division of the Department of Labor

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 17, 1941No. 330PublishedCited by 455 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Three types of questions are presented by the petition for certiorari in this case:

First, whether the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 1060, is authorized by the Commerce Clause, violates the Tenth Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and is an unconstitutional delegation of the legislative power of Congress to the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor, appointed pursuant to § 4 (a) of the Act.

Second, whether an order of the Administrator prescribing a minimum wage in an industry is unauthorized by the statute and invalid…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by455 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

450 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API