Patton v. City of Bellingham
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
This action was brought to test the constitutionality and validity of a statute and an ordinance, respectively, restricting the hours of opening and closing barber shops. Upon the commencement of the action, an order temporarily restraining* enforcement of the ordinance was obtained. A subsequent trial before the court resulted in findings and conclusions, based upon which a decree was entered dissolving* the temporary restraining order and denying any relief under the complaint. This appeal followed.
The statute involved reads as follows:
“The governing body of any city of the first, second,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Chaires v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- City of Alexandria v. HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Detamore v. HindleyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- City of Cincinnati v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Herrin v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- State Board of Barber Examiners v. CloudIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Louisville v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- Lauterbach v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1956
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.