Legal Opinion

Patton v. City of Bellingham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1934No. 25022. En BancPublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This action was brought to test the constitutionality and validity of a statute and an ordinance, respectively, restricting the hours of opening and closing barber shops. Upon the commencement of the action, an order temporarily restraining* enforcement of the ordinance was obtained. A subsequent trial before the court resulted in findings and conclusions, based upon which a decree was entered dissolving* the temporary restraining order and denying any relief under the complaint. This appeal followed.

The statute involved reads as follows:

“The governing body of any city of the first, second,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Chaires v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  4. City of Alexandria v. HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  5. Detamore v. HindleyWashington Supreme Court · 1915

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. City of Cincinnati v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Herrin v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. State Board of Barber Examiners v. CloudIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  4. City of Louisville v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  5. Lauterbach v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1956

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API