Legal Opinion
Herrin v. Arnold
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 26, 1938No. 28307PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGib'Son, J.
The point at issue here is the validity of those sections of article 2 of chapter 24 of the Session Laws of 1937 which have to do with the fixing of minimum prices barbers may charge for their services. The ease is here on application for writ of prohibition to restrain a district judge from making any further orders in an injunction suit brought by the Board of Barber Examiners of the State of Oklahoma against the plaintiffs here.
According to their petition the plaintiffs have for many years conducted their barber shop in the city of Edmond and have, by charging low prices, built up a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Associated Industries of Oklahoma v. Industrial Welfare CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Gibson Products Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Palmer Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- State Board of Barber Examiners v. CloudIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
- Bailey v. State Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.