Legal Opinion
Chaires v. City of Atlanta
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 14, 1927No. Nos. 5648, 5649PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
We are of the opinion that the court erred in refusing to enjoin the enforcement of section 2 of the ordinance in question. The amendment to section 2, which is shown in the evidence, did not remove the objectionable features of the ordinance. The questions made as to the validity of section 2 of the ordinance are important, but are by no means novel. The same questions have been' considered and decided by courts of last resort in several States of this country. While the precise question presented has not been ruled on by this court, decisions have been…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Buchanan v. WarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- City of Cincinnati v. CorrellOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Alston v. School Board of City of NorfolkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- Patton v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- City of Alexandria v. HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- State Ex Rel. Newman v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.