Legal Opinion

Lauterbach v. City of Centralia

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1956No. 33529PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The city of Centralia appeals from a judgment which (a) restrains enforcement of that portion- of Centralia ordinance No. 973 purporting to give authority to the city commission to rezone the. city of Centralia without first obtaining a recommendation or an approval of the city planning commission; and (b) restrains enforcement -of ordinance No. 978 in so far as it purports to change the use zone in which plaintiffs’ property is located from a •residential-use district to a commercial-use district.

The handicap, arising from plaintiffs’ failure to appear in this court, is minimized by the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lillions v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. State ex rel. Webster v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Patton v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State Ex Rel. Fairmount Center Co. v. ArnoldOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Columbia Irrigation District v. Benton CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Campbell v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Adler v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Biggers v. City of Bainbridge IslandWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. King County Water District No. 54 v. King County Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. City of Spokane v. J-R Distributors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1978

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API