Legal Opinion

McCullough v. Langer

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1937No. Civ. 5660PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendant, Dr. Joseph Langer, has appealed from a judgment which was rendered against him in a suit for malpractice of the medical profession consisting of alleged improper use of an infra-red incandescent lamp which caused permanent injury to plaintiff’s leg in the nature of a third-degree burn, as a result thereof. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the codefendant, Mae Roberts, who, as appellant’s nurse, had charge of the patient at the time of the injury. The cause was dismissed as to the other codefendant, Dr. Hoag. The jury returned a verdict of $50,000, which, upon motion for a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Olsen v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Armstrong v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Benson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Meyer v. McNutt HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Engelking v. CarlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Jackson v. Southwestern Public Service CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. StampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Bauer v. OtisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Neumann v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API