Legal Opinion

Bauer v. Otis

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1955No. Civ. 16270PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Should proffered instructions on res ipsa loquitur have been given, is the sole question presented on this appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action for malpractice brought against defendant Otis, a nurse, and defendant Hayes, a medical doctor.

Facts

The complaint states two causes of action, one for negligance against both defendants, the other against Dr. Hayes alone for negligence in employing an unqualified nurse to administer the injection hereafter mentioned. Plaintiff was nonsuited on the second cause of action but does not appeal therefrom.

The lawsuit…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Huffman v. LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Ales v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Barham v. WidingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Bardessono v. MichelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Gherna v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Putensen v. Clay Adams, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API