Legal Opinion

Wheeler Lumber, Bridge & Supply Co. v. Shelton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

It appears from the record that Sim F. Etzel was engaged in cutting rough fir lumber at a mill which he was operating some seven'miles from the town of Lyons in Linn county, Oregon. On November 10, 1930, the Coast Pir & Cedar Products Company, a corporation, then engaged in buying and selling lumber in Portland, Oregon, placed its orders with Etzel for the cutting to dimensions of approximately 750,000 feet B. M. of No. 1 common fir bridge planking; Etzel then began cutting on these orders. As the lumber was cut and put in piles and tallied by Etzel, pursuant to the directions of Coast Pir &…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. McGarryOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hudelson v. Sanders-Swafford Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Wright v. SolomonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Rawley v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  5. Schumann v. Bank of California, N. A.Oregon Supreme Court · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Matsuda v. Noble and DecosterOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Pacific Wool Growers v. Draper & Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Dufield v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. Johnston v. AsbahrOregon Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API