Rhodes v. McGarry
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Umatilla county: Jas. A. Fee, judge. The appellant commenced a suit against the respondents in the cireuit court to reform a deed to real property, executed by the respondent McGarry to appellant; also to restrain the other respondents from selling real property which she claimed was intended to be conveyed to her by such deed.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Umatilla county: Jas. A. Fee, judge. The appellant commenced a suit against the respondents in the cireuit court to reform a deed to real property, executed by the respondent McGarry to appellant; also to restrain the other respondents from selling real property which she claimed was intended to be conveyed to her by such deed. The appellant alleged in her complaint that on the twenty-fourth day of February, 1885, said McGarry was the owner in fee and in possession of block 285 of the Reserve addition to the town of Pendleton, Umatilla county, and that, on said last-mentioned…
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, C. J.
I have read the depositions of the witnesses taken herein and the exhibits submitted in proof, and am of the opinion that they fully sustain the referee in his findings regarding the mistake in the execution of the deed by John McGarry to the appellant.
The testimony shows beyond question that the parties had in view the sale and purchase of block 285 in the Reserve addition to the town of Pendleton, Umatilla *228county, Oregon, and that in filling out the said deed the said block was by mistake described as block 258. Said findings, as to tbe conveyance of said block 285 by appellant to George W.…
2Cited by25 opinions
- Raymond v. FlavelOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Brown v. LairdOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Ayre v. HixsonOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Flegel v. KossOregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Dimmick v. RosenfeldOregon Supreme Court · 1898
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.