Legal Opinion
Matsuda v. Noble and Decoster
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 1948PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.
The plaintiffs Matsuda were the owners of farm lands in Polk County, Oregon. The plaintiff, C. D. Matsuda, being a Japanese, was interned from June, 1942 until August, 1945. His son, the plaintiff William K. Matsuda, entered the military service of the United States in August, 1944. These circumstances made it necessary for the plaintiffs to make arrangements for the operation of their Polk County farm during their absence. The plaintiff C. D. Matsuda acted for and on behalf of both plaintiffs. On 31 January 1945, the plaintiffs, by C. D. Matsuda, executed and caused to be recorded in Polk…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chase National Bank v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Vulcan Iron Works v. EdwardsOregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Rhodes v. McGarryOregon Supreme Court · 1890
- Ward v. JamesOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Flegel v. KossOregon Supreme Court · 1906
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- D. K. Porter, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Abe Greenband v. Woodey B. Searle and Edlean E. SearleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Nelson v. HughesOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Chaffin v. SolomonOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Nevael Investment Corp. v. Schrunk & SmytheOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Partlow v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.