McNickel's, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
TOAL, Justice:
This case presents the question whether the South Carolina Department of Revenue (“Department”) exceeded its authority under the Video Game Machines Act when it promulgated the “employee requirement” in 27 S.C.Code Ann. Regs. 117-190 (Supp.1997). We find Department did not and, accordingly, affirm.
Factual/Procedural Background
Two businesses, Black Burner Cafe and Treasures Revived, are located in a strip shopping center in Hilton Head, South Carolina. Black Burner Cafe occupies # 11 Northridge Road, while Treasures Revived occupies # 13 Northridge Road. The businesses are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Heyward v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Society of Professional Journalists v. SextonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Banks v. Batesburg Hauling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
- U.S. Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Hunter & Walden Co. v. South Carolina State Licensing Board for ContractorsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
3Cited by7 opinions
- Great Games, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Gadson v. Mikasa Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Cole Ex Rel. Estate of Cole v. South Carolina Electric & Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.