Legal Opinion

Heyward v. South Carolina Tax Commission

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 5, 1962No. 17920PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Justice.

Roger M. Heyward, As Executor of the Estate of Nathalie H. Miller, the appellant herein, brought this action against the South Carolina Tax Commission, the respondent herein, under Sections 65-2661 et seq., as amended, Code of 1952, to recover income taxes with interest thereon, which the appellant paid under protest. The case was heard in the Court below upon the pleadings and an agreed stipulation of the facts. This appeal is prosecuted from an order awarding judgment in favor of the respondent. ■

Mrs. Nathalie H. Miller owned certain stock which had a cost to her for tax…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burnet v. S. & L. Building Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. McEachern v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. South Carolina State Highway Department v. HarbinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. Farrow v. City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  5. Byars v. Cherokee CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. S & M Finance Co. Fort Dodge v. Iowa State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  2. State Ex Rel. Williams v. AdamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Adams v. BurtsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  4. Ahrens v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Hay v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API