Legal Opinion

Hunter & Walden Co. v. South Carolina State Licensing Board for Contractors

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 28, 1978No. 20823PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

The sole issue in this appeal is the validity of a regulation promulgated by the appellant, the South Carolina State Licensing Board for Contractors. Pursuant to Regulation 29-4, a contractor who is in compliance with Code Section 40-11-160 (1976) must show a net worth of $50,000 in order to be licensed. The trial court concluded that “the regulation bears no rational relationship to the job and is therefore arbitrary.” (Tr. p. 5). We disagree and reverse.

Code Section 40-11-160 (1976) provides that the Board shall not issue a license to any contractor who contracts or intends to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mourning v. Family Publications Service, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. U.S. Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. McNickel's, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. Young v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  5. US OUTDOOR AD. v. Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API