Gadson v. Mikasa Corp.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, J.:
In this Workers’ Compensation case, the employer, Mikasa Corporation, and its insurance carrier, The Yasuda Fire & Marine Insurance Company (collectively referred to as Mikasa) appeal the circuit court’s affirmance of the appellate panel’s ruling that Kathleen L. Gadson had reached maximum medical improvement and was entitled to permanent disability benefits. We affirm.
FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In September of 1997, Kathleen Gadson began working for Mikasa in Charleston, South Carolina. On January 8, 1998, Gadson sustained an injury by accident arising out of and in the course…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Shealy v. Aiken CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Payton v. KearseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Fields v. Regional Medical Center OrangeburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Gooding v. St. Francis Xavier HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hall v. United Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Houston v. Deloach & DeloachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Forrest v. A.S. Price MechanicalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
- Kimmer v. Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Thompson Ex Rel. Harvey v. CISSON CONST.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.