Legal Opinion

Great Games, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 6, 2000No. 25081PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINNEY, Chief Justice:

Respondent (Department) sought to impose sanctions upon appellants (Busters) for alleged violations of a video gaming statute 1 and regulation. 2 The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) upheld Department’s citation, and Busters appealed to circuit court. The circuit court first held it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the appeal, and alternatively, that the ALJ’s order was supported by substantial evidence. Busters now appeals to this Court. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Busters operated a video machine mall consisting of a common area from which six separate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. Mid-State Auto Auction of Lexington, Inc. v. AltmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Dove v. Gold Kist, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. South Carolina Tax Commission v. South Carolina Tax Board of ReviewSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  5. Beaufort County Board of Education v. Lighthouse Charter School CommitteeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Crossmann Communities of North Carolina, Inc. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Town of Mt. Pleasant v. RobertsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Slezak v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  5. Stardancer Casino, Inc. v. StewartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API