Legal Opinion
Allen v. Burnet Realty, LLC
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 3, 2011No. A09-1963PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.
Appellant Timothy B. Allen asks us to decide whether contracts he signed while he worked as a sales associate for respondent Burnet Realty LLC were contracts of insurance as a matter of Minnesota law. Under the contracts, Allen and Burnet Re*155alty agreed to an allocation of expenses should a dispute arise related to Allen’s work for Burnet Realty. In litigation commenced after he left Burnet Realty, Allen claimed that Burnet Realty violated Minn. Stat. § 60K.47 (2010) because the contracts were insurance, and as a result, Burnet Realty was required to be, but…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Jordan v. Group Health Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Knutson Construction Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Edward Martin v. Gregory PowersTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- McBee v. Team Indus., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- Toeller v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Dean v. City of WinonaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.