Legal Opinion
Dean v. City of Winona
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 24, 2014No. A13-1028PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARKIN, Judge.
Appellants, owners of residential properties in respondent municipality, challenge the summary judgment upholding respondent’s ordinance that limits, to 30%, the number of lots on a block that are eligible to obtain certification as a rental property. Because respondent’s adoption of the ordinance was an authorized exercise of its police power and because appellants have not met their burden to show that the ordinance is unconstitutional, we affirm.
FACTS
This case stems from respondent City of Winona’s adoption of an ordinance that limits, in certain districts of the city,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Kirsch Holding Co. v. Borough of ManasquanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- McCannel v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Contos v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ethan Dean v. City of WinonaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Fletcher Props., Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- Forslund v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- 32 Intervale v. City of BurlingtonVermont Superior Court · 2024
- Ethan Dean v. City of WinonaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.