Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Fuhrman

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1933No. Docket No. 1702PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Defendant was charged with the crime of rape and also with the violation of section 288 of the Penal Code. He was convicted on the first charge and appeals from the judgment and an order denying a motion for a new trial.

As grounds for the appeal it is contended that the evidence fails to show the commission of any offense at the time alleged by the prosecution, and that the court erred in its instructions to the jury.

The information alleged that the offense first charged was committed on or about October 15, 1930. The district attorney in opening the case stated in substance that he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People v. KollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. WademanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. People v. ElgarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. People v. JewettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. People v. AllingtonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1951
  4. People v. SmithleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. State v. CurtisOhio Court of Appeals · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API