Legal Opinion

People v. Allington

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided March 30, 1951No. Crim. A. No. 2674PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP,

The ultimate question to be answered in this ease was whether the defendant had been convicted of one or of two offenses. The answer to that question depended upon the answer to be given to a basic question: does section 647, Penal Code, create one, or a dozen or more, public offenses? We have concluded, not without some misgiving, that but one crime is created, and that the defendant should have but one sentence to serve, although he was convicted under two subdivisions of the section. On this appeal, then, from the “judgment of conviction” one of the two judgments imposed is…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. People v. DoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. People v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  4. People v. ShotwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  5. People v. ClemettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. JaurequiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. People v. HathawayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. People v. AlbertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. People v. HustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. People v. AlbertsAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API