Legal Opinion

People v. Wademan

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1918No. Crim. No. 444PublishedCited by 22 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. A. Anderson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. ■

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Defenant was informed against by the district attorney of Yolo County for the crime of rape. He was found guilty and thereupon moved for a new trial, which was denied, and the court sentenced him to imprisonment in the state prison at San Quentin. The appeal is from the judgment and the order denying the motion for a new trial.

1. When the information was filed it charged that the crime was committed within one year prior thereto, .upon one Augusta Schwall, a female child of the age of fourteen years. Upon demurrer to the information the court permitted the district attorney to amend the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People v. KollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  5. People v. TomskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. KochWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Hash v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  3. In Re BasuinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. People v. MeravigliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. People v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API