Legal Opinion

People v. Hall

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1938No. Crim. 1598PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

Defendant was accused and convicted of the crime of incest. Upon this appeal from the judgment and from the order denying the motion for a new trial appellant contends that the evidence does not support the verdict, that the court and district attorney were guilty of misconduct, and that the motion for a new trial should have been granted.

It is not necessarjr to recite in detail the evidence submitted to the jury. In brief, however, it appears that ap pellant and his family, consisting of his wife and two children, lived near Diamond Springs in El Dorado County. The complaining witness, a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. KollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. People v. PiercyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. People v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. People v. FuhrmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. People v. GrimesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. State v. RickersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Huffaker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  5. People v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API