Marriage of Pekarek v. Wilking
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from an order directing entry of amended judgment and decree affecting the parties’ dissolution. Appellant claims (1) the order should be vacated because the stipulation on which it was based was not voluntarily entered, (2) the trial court erred in improperly managing an expert appraisal, (3) the trial court improperly modified child support, (4) respondent should not be awarded bad faith attorney’s fees, and (5) appellant should be awarded attorney’s fees based on financial need. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Judith Ann (Pekarek) Wilking and respondent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ryan v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- National Recruiters, Inc. v. Toro Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Tomscak v. TomscakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Frederiksen v. FrederiksenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- In Re the Marriage of Abuzzahab v. AbuzzahabCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Estate of Thomas v. SheffieldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Marriage of Kroeplin v. HaugenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Angier v. AngierCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Marriage of Maranda v. MarandaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Shirk v. ShirkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.