Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Estate of Thomas v. Sheffield

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1994No. 18247PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

This appeal arises from a dispute over an agreement concerning real property distributed in a divorce action. We affirm.

FACTS

Dorothy Sheffield Thomas (Thomas) and Keith Sheffield (Sheffield) were divorced on August 29, 1984. Under the Final Decree of Divorce, Sheffield managed the farm real estate which he and Thomas held as tenants in common. The Final Decree also provided that, after four years, either party could move to sell the farm real estate. Sheffield moved for an Order directing a Sheriffs Sale of the real estate on November 11, 1988, *842which was granted. It was sold…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Waddell v. Dewey County BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Lamp v. First National Bank of GarretsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Seablom v. SeablomNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Radigan v. RadiganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Houser v. HouserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Canal Insurance Co. v. AbrahamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Weekley v. WeekleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Beermann v. BeermannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Jacobson v. JacobsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API