Legal Opinion

Marriage of Angier v. Angier

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 10, 1987No. C6-87-1158PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

This appeal is brought under Minn.R.Civ. App.P. 103.03(e) from an order denying a motion to reopen a judgment and decree. We affirm.

FACTS

The marriage of appellant Carol Angier and respondent Thomas Angier was dissolved pursuant to stipulation, executed in September and October 1985, and incorporated into the October 16, 1985, judgment and decree. The provisions dealing with custody, child support and certain property distributions are not at issue in this appeal. Two provisions which awarded the homestead to the respondent and $6,000 cash to the appellant are, however,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tomscak v. TomscakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Cahaley v. CahaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Marriage of Lindsey v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Berg v. BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  5. Marriage of Pekarek v. WilkingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marriage of Maranda v. MarandaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Marriage of Maranda v. MarandaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Marriage of Maranda v. MarandaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API