Legal Opinion

Shirk v. Shirk

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 16, 1996No. C2-95-2563PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

The district court, finding that attorney misconduct caused incompetent representation by respondent wife’s attorney, vacated the financial portions of a dissolution judgment. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Sandra Shirk, represented by attorney John Mulcahey, filed a petition to dissolve her 29-year marriage to appellant Glen Shirk. In the April 1994 petition, she requested temporary and permanent maintenance. In June, respondent moved for temporary maintenance. A hearing was scheduled for August.

The parties, through their attorneys, agreed to conduct informal discovery. In…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Marriage of Maranda v. MarandaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Tomscak v. TomscakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Straus v. StrausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Marriage of Pekarek v. WilkingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marriage of Shirk v. ShirkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API