Legal Opinion

Marriage of Kroeplin v. Haugen

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 29, 1986No. C6-85-2225PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

In this marriage dissolution, Margaret Kroeplin appeals from the trial court’s orders denying her post-decree motions and holding her in constructive contempt of court for failing to comply with the terms of the dissolution judgment. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant petitioned for a dissolution of her marriage with respondent, Dennis Hau-gen, and the matter went to trial on June 26, 1985. The parties first stipulated to custody and visitation in accordance with the temporary relief order in effect since November 1984. Appellant’s attorney read this stipulation into the record;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. White Bear Rod & Gun ClubSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Tomscak v. TomscakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Marriage of Lindsey v. LindseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Marriage of Tell v. TellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Becker v. BeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Marriage of Angier v. AngierCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Cadle v. CadleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Marriage of Maranda v. MarandaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Marriage of Yi Ning Ma v. Mei Fang MaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Burgardt v. BurgardtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API