Legal Opinion

Fishleigh v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1919No. Docket No. 88PublishedCited by 41 opinions

■ Error to Wayne; Webster, J. Case by Maude Fishleigh against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Plaintiff brings this action to recover damages for personal injuries received by her in an accident occasioned by the collision of two street cars owned and operated by and on defendant’s system in the city of Detroit, on the evening of February 14, 1916. When the cars collided plaintiff was thrown forward, her knee or knees striking the seat in front; upon the recoil she struck the back of the seat, which broke, either as the result of her body striking against it or from others falling upon it, the car being crowded, and she was struck by the broken seat or a piece thereof, an iron rod…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Smith v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Perkins v. Sunset Tel. and Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Sioux City & Pacific Railroad v. FinlaysonNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Briesenmeister v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias of the WorldMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Briggs v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1870

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Stowers v. WolodzkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Palenkas v. Beaumont HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Reetz v. Kinsman Marine Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Moore v. SpanglerMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Precopio v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API