Legal Opinion

Moore v. Spangler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1977No. 58081, (Calendar No. 1)PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.

Plaintiff Edna Moore was injured in a rear-end automobile collision. Plaintiff commenced this action for negligence against defendant Harold Spangler, the driver of the automobile which struck plaintiff’s automobile. The case was tried in district court, and the jury found defendant liable and awarded plaintiff $1,344 in dam*365ages. Plaintiffs motion for additur or in the alternative a new trial was denied by the district court, and on appeal the circuit court affirmed. Plaintiff raises four issues in her appeal to this Court:

1. Whether the refusal of the circuit court to allow oral argument on…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. People v. ColesMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Doe v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Ad + Soil, Inc. v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Bosak v. HutchinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Precopio v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API