Legal Opinion

Reetz v. Kinsman Marine Transit Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1982No. Docket 63857PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Per curiam

Richard L. Reetz commenced this action against Kinsman Marine Transit Company to recover for injuries he sustained in September, 1974, while employed as a deckhand aboard Kinsman’s vessel the Merle McCurdy. At that time, while engaged in a procedure to open the hatches on the vessel, Reetz fell backwards into an open hatch and plummeted approximately 40 feet to the steel deck below.

Reetz alleged under the Jones Act, 46 USC 688, that his injuries were caused by Kinsman’s negligence in failing to properly train Reetz or, alternatively, that Kinsman was liable because of the vessel’s…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. DegraffenreidMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. People v. HumphreysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. People v. BiggeMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Hill v. Harbor Steel & Supply Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Murphy v. International Robotic Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Harlow v. ChinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. People v. UllahMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Wiley v. Henry Ford Cottage HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API