Legal Opinion

Sioux City & Pacific Railroad v. Finlayson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1884PublishedCited by 53 opinions

Error to the district court for Washington county. Tried below before Neville, J.

1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.

This is an action against the plaintiff in error, the Sioux City & Pacific Railroad Company, for damages resulting from a personal injury caused by the explosion of an engine of said company, and on which defendant in ■error was at the time engaged and employed as an engineer. The petition alleges that the engine became and remained defective and dangerous .through the negligence of the plaintiff in error. The answer of plaintiff in error admitted the explosion of the boiler on the engine, but denied all negligence or carelessness of the company; denied that the plaintiff had received the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. C. R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  2. Keegan v. . the Western R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1853
  3. B. & M. R. R. v. SchluntzNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Holmes v. IrwinNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Theodore A. Harris, Father and Next Friend of Patrick Harris, a Minor v. Richard D. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  3. Carleton v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Fishleigh v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Ala. Great Southern R. R. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API