Legal Opinion

Ortzman v. Van Der Waal

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 1952No. Civ. 19070PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATROSSO, J. pro tem.

In this action for personal injuries allegedly resulting from a collision between the motor vehicles of the respective parties, plaintiff appeals from a judgment in her favor entered upon a verdict of the jury in the sum of $100.

As grounds for reversal appellant contends (1) that the judgment is not supported by the evidence in that the damages awarded were inadequate and not commensurate with the nature and extent of the injuries sustained by her and (2) that the court erred in giving an instruction hereinafter noted.

The accident in question occurred during the noon hour…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Fuentes v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Howard v. Owens CorningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Jarchow v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. People v. LoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Goehring v. Chapman UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. People v. HeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API