Legal Opinion

People v. Hecker

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1960No. Civ. 24033PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant Hecker and others to condemn certain parcels of land lying seaward to the Pacific Ocean. Although the issue of title was determined by the court, the question of value was heard by the jury. Hecker was declared to be owner of Parcels A, C and D, and the underlying fee of E, as to Parcel B, the trial court found that it consists entirely of artificial accretions, adjudged the state the owner thereof, and denied him any compensable right therein. It is from that portion of the judgment defendant appeals. The issues before us relate solely to the ownership of Parcel B…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Bonelli Cattle Co. v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Colberg, Inc. v. State of California Ex Rel. Dept. Pub. Wks.California Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State Ex Rel. Kobayashi v. ZimringHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State of California Ex Rel. State Lands Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API