Stephans v. Herman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.
Plaintiffs loaned defendants Herman $9,000, and took back a promissory note, payable 90 days thereafter, for $11,500. The note was secured by four lots conveyed by deed of trust to defendant title company, as trustee. Two lots were sold under a prior deed of trust, and are not here in issue. The real estate broker who handled the transaction was in prison at time of trial. She and Mrs. Herman prepared a request for partial reconveyance. Bearing the forged signatures of plaintiffs, this request and a forged note were presented to the title company, which reconveyed lots 8 and 9 to the Hermans…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. McCulloughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Jones v. MortimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Williams v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Redevelopment Agency v. ModellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Munger v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Wycalis v. Guardian Title of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- Ruth v. Lytton Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Pease v. TaylorNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Winnett v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.