Legal Opinion
Ruth v. Lytton Savings & Loan Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1968No. Civ. 24737PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtElkington, J.
Plaintiffs Howard and Martha Ruth lost their interest in certain real property upon foreclosure of trust deeds held by defendant Lytton Savings and Loan Association (herein called “Lytton”). Seeking declaratory and other relief from Lytton, Transamerica Title Insurance Company, successor to City Title Insurance Company (herein called “City Title”), Seabreeze Construction Company, Inc. (herein called “Seabreeze”), Lytton Financial Corporation (trustee of Lytton’s trust deed) and Jeremy Ets-Hokin, doing business as Riviera Properties (herein called “Ets-Hokin”), they commenced this action. As…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Prentice v. North American Title Guaranty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Reese v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Eramdjian v. Interstate Bakery Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Overholtzer v. Northern Counties Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Northwestern Title Security Co. v. FlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Moe v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Brown v. BorenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Slaughter v. Legal Process & Courier ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Smith v. State Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.