Legal Opinion
Redevelopment Agency v. Modell
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 22, 1960No. Civ. 9722PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARNE, J. pro tem. *
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Sacramento brought this action to condemn appellants’ property situate at the northwest corner of 6th and “O” Streets in the city of Sacramento. The proceedings were brought pursuant to the provisions of the community redevelopment law (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 33000-33985), and under the general authorization of section 1001 of the Civil Code and section 1238, subdivision 21, of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The subject property is situated wholly within the boundaries of a certain 15-block area within Redevelopment Area No. 1, which is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. McCulloughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- City of Chicago v. KoffIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
- Avins v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
3Cited by17 opinions
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.