Legal Opinion

Overby v. Overby

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 31, 1957No. Civ. 17363PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

This appeal by defendant husband from an interlocutory decree of divorce granted plaintiff wife raises the question of how the year required to expire between the interlocutory and final decrees shall be computed.

Record

Plaintiff sued for divorce upon the grounds of extreme cruelty. Defendant cross-complained for an annulment on the ground that plaintiff’s previous marriage had not been annulled at the time of her marriage to defendant on September 11, 1949. At the trial it appeared that plaintiff had obtained an interlocutory decree of divorce from her former husband on September 10, 1948,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Estate of HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Flakoll v. HalamudaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Cosgriff v. Bd. of Election Commr's of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Kelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. MacEdo v. MacEdoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hurst v. HurstCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Reichardt v. ReichardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Kern v. KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Wixted v. FletcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API