Legal Opinion

Estate of Hughes

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1947No. Civ. 15820PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, Acting P. J.

Euldene F. Hughes appeals from the portion of an order which denied her a widow’s allowance in the estate of Aloysius Peter Hughes, the sole ground of the decision being that appellant was not legally married to the decedent. By the same order $200 a month was allowed for the support of Peter J. Hughes, son of appellant and decedent. The estate was found to have a net value of some $70,000 and a probable net annual income of between $5,000 and $6,000. While it was also found that appellant had an income of some $300 per month, her application was not denied upon that ground. The sole question…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. In Re Estate of DargieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Borg v. BorgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. In Re Estate of SeilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Cornell v. CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Gonzales v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Leaf v. Phil Rauch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API