Estate of Hughes
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShinn, Acting P. J.
Euldene F. Hughes appeals from the portion of an order which denied her a widow’s allowance in the estate of Aloysius Peter Hughes, the sole ground of the decision being that appellant was not legally married to the decedent. By the same order $200 a month was allowed for the support of Peter J. Hughes, son of appellant and decedent. The estate was found to have a net value of some $70,000 and a probable net annual income of between $5,000 and $6,000. While it was also found that appellant had an income of some $300 per month, her application was not denied upon that ground. The sole question…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- In Re Estate of DargieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Borg v. BorgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- In Re Estate of SeilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Cornell v. CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Gonzales v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Leaf v. Phil Rauch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.